Click here to read the post in Inglés
In the semifinal of the Final 4 in the Euroleague, among other things interesting, FC Barcelona showed innovative defense (at least I do not remember have seen before)
CSKA Siskaukas frequently used (and perhaps not the best "3" Europe will have to ask him what he thinks Pete Mickael) to attack in the low post smaller players. Planinic or Ponkrashov can also easily post from lower bases.
In CPN, Barcelona decided to defend both Planinic Siskaukas as against one in a pure, Mickael and Rubio, and the defense was pretty good. Problems arose with Grimau or Lakovic in court, given the need to stop those players from the Russian team.
At that time (in fact, in a time-out after the first clear advantages Siskaukas pole low against the eaves Catalan) Barca defense used in the video I show you. Managed to defend the low post with a larger player (the defender of "5"), but lost strength in the hand of aid, finding some problems in the rebound. Also defending on occasion just a little with a great out of the paint (which was a minor problem, clearly). In the video I've circled in red CSKA favorable mismatches (offensive rebound, a small versus a large beyond the line of three) and in green those in which either there is no advantage to the Russians or even the advantage is for the Catalan team (a "5" defending a "3" in the low post)
Barca used this defense on three occasions. The pivot of CSKA Kaun offensive rebounding in the first (and was fouled). The defense forced a bad shot in the second (after a two to one impressive low post.) The Russian team striker, Ponkrashov, was fouled in the third.
Now I would like that after seeing the video, comment on your opinion on this defense:
Have you ever seen anything like this before? Do you think this defense creates a good choice or many options for the attack (offensive rebound, disturbances ...)? How would you improve (if you think it should be improved)? We're going to mess
...
In the semifinal of the Final 4 in the Euroleague, among other things interesting, FC Barcelona showed innovative defense (at least I do not remember have seen before)
CSKA Siskaukas frequently used (and perhaps not the best "3" Europe will have to ask him what he thinks Pete Mickael) to attack in the low post smaller players. Planinic or Ponkrashov can also easily post from lower bases.
In CPN, Barcelona decided to defend both Planinic Siskaukas as against one in a pure, Mickael and Rubio, and the defense was pretty good. Problems arose with Grimau or Lakovic in court, given the need to stop those players from the Russian team.
At that time (in fact, in a time-out after the first clear advantages Siskaukas pole low against the eaves Catalan) Barca defense used in the video I show you. Managed to defend the low post with a larger player (the defender of "5"), but lost strength in the hand of aid, finding some problems in the rebound. Also defending on occasion just a little with a great out of the paint (which was a minor problem, clearly). In the video I've circled in red CSKA favorable mismatches (offensive rebound, a small versus a large beyond the line of three) and in green those in which either there is no advantage to the Russians or even the advantage is for the Catalan team (a "5" defending a "3" in the low post)
Barca used this defense on three occasions. The pivot of CSKA Kaun offensive rebounding in the first (and was fouled). The defense forced a bad shot in the second (after a two to one impressive low post.) The Russian team striker, Ponkrashov, was fouled in the third.
Now I would like that after seeing the video, comment on your opinion on this defense:
Have you ever seen anything like this before? Do you think this defense creates a good choice or many options for the attack (offensive rebound, disturbances ...)? How would you improve (if you think it should be improved)? We're going to mess
...
0 comments:
Post a Comment